<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515</id><updated>2011-12-02T12:24:22.538-08:00</updated><category term='SEO Superstitions'/><category term='Google Adsense'/><category term='Essentials of SEO'/><category term='Search Quality'/><category term='Web Logs'/><category term='Google'/><category term='Search Quality Wikipedia'/><category term='Blogging'/><title type='text'>SEO For Everyone</title><subtitle type='html'>A blog about Search Engine optimization for the rest of us. If everyone should be publishing on the Web, everyone should know about SEO!</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>45</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1400146732677233530</id><published>2010-01-05T09:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-05T09:13:21.619-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Cloud Computing: Don't junk your PC just yet</title><summary type='text'>Self-styled financial mayvens and fools,  motley and otherwise, are insisting that the "wave of the future" is cloud  computing. The bulky and expensive PC will be replaced by a low powered and  simple computer that runs a "thin client" software program connected to an  Internet Software Services Provider, such as Google. The provider will run the latest versions  of spreadsheets, word processors</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1400146732677233530/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1400146732677233530' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1400146732677233530'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1400146732677233530'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2010/01/cloud-computing-dont-junk-your-pc-just.html' title='Cloud Computing: Don&apos;t junk your PC just yet'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-68031279160798868</id><published>2009-08-21T04:23:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-21T04:23:27.668-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The end of free Internet news?</title><summary type='text'>Rupert Murdoch and others have decided it is time  to end free news content  on the Web. One of the reasons that  someone like Murdoch could make such a proposition is that he admittedly knows  nothing about the Internet or how it works. I think there is no way at all to  really end free content and that paid content will never be able to compete with  free. Consider firstly all the legitimate </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/68031279160798868/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=68031279160798868' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/68031279160798868'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/68031279160798868'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/08/end-of-free-internet-news.html' title='The end of free Internet news?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-4426915044648537237</id><published>2009-05-22T17:48:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-22T17:48:51.340-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Decline of Dmoz: Schadenfreude and sadness</title><summary type='text'>As a long time frustrated user, submitter and  ex-editor of the Open Directory (AKA Dmoz) I had feelings of Schadenfreude mixed  with sadness when I learned of its decline. It has lost a lot of its viewing  public, mostly because search engines do the search job better, but it has also  stopped accumulating new listings. Triplicate listing of garbage pages, editors  that tyrannize people with </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/4426915044648537237/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=4426915044648537237' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4426915044648537237'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4426915044648537237'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/05/decline-of-dmoz-schadenfreude-and.html' title='Decline of Dmoz: Schadenfreude and sadness'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-5967464288677686755</id><published>2009-05-22T17:48:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-22T17:48:51.104-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sorting media garbage from media information - with special application to the Web and Internet</title><summary type='text'>When I wrote the article: The Decline of Dmoz. it got me thinking  about how to give Web page and other media raters objective criteria for  deciding if an article or other media item is useful or good or if it is flotsam  to be ignored. If there was a directory for "everything" how would you keep out  the flood of garbage in internet, printed matter, video and TV, and how could  you spot and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/5967464288677686755/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=5967464288677686755' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5967464288677686755'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5967464288677686755'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/05/sorting-media-garbage-from-media.html' title='Sorting media garbage from media information - with special application to the Web and Internet'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-4987744205344187123</id><published>2009-03-16T11:23:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-16T11:23:40.512-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Google Keyword Search Frequency mystery, or "Is Sex going out of style?"</title><summary type='text'>According to  Google's  AdWords tool,  sex may be going out of style. That is,  Google's data show  supposedly that over a 12 month period, on average there were 124,000,000   (One Hundred and Twenty Four Million) searches for keyword Sex each month,  whereas in the month of February there were only 90,500 (Ninety thousand Five  Hundred) people searching for sex. No mistake about the number of 0s</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/4987744205344187123/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=4987744205344187123' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4987744205344187123'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4987744205344187123'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/03/google-keyword-search-frequency-mystery.html' title='Google Keyword Search Frequency mystery, or &quot;Is Sex going out of style?&quot;'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-8332723560777920574</id><published>2009-03-16T09:32:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-16T09:33:13.021-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What happened to Jewwatch.com?</title><summary type='text'>A political-social search engine optimization  issue developed around the hate web site jewwatch.com. For many  years, searches in  Google for the   keyword   Jew returned this odious site  at the top of the  listings or among the first ten. Jewwatch.com features  standard Anti-Semitism fare  including ZOG, the  Zionist Occupied Goverment and the forged Protocols  of the Elders of Zion. Attempts </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/8332723560777920574/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=8332723560777920574' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/8332723560777920574'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/8332723560777920574'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/03/what-happened-to-jewwatchcom.html' title='What happened to Jewwatch.com?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1626925987733343090</id><published>2009-02-15T11:27:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-15T11:27:33.474-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Solution for Duplicate page listings - 'canonical' attribute in head tag</title><summary type='text'>One sort of duplicate content happens because  of plagiarism, copying to forums, copying of articles to blogs (see   How Google Treats Duplicate Content). In those cases, there are  really several physical instances of a page for various  reasons.    But there is another sort of "duplicate content"  that is often really just an artifact of how the Web works and in part a bug of  search engines. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1626925987733343090/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1626925987733343090' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1626925987733343090'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1626925987733343090'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/02/solution-for-duplicate-page-listings.html' title='Solution for Duplicate page listings - &apos;canonical&apos; attribute in head tag'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-7539661732652343734</id><published>2009-02-14T03:37:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-14T06:06:21.011-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Search Quality'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google'/><title type='text'>How Google treats Duplicate Content</title><summary type='text'>Duplicate content is a headache for Search  Engine positioning. Duplicate content is created in these  situations:       Syndicated news items that appear in many Web    sites    Sites that legitimately archive news    items   Blogs that legitimately quote part of an article,    or provide an entire article for reference.and link to the original under    "fair use" doctrine.    "Classic" articles</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/7539661732652343734/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=7539661732652343734' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7539661732652343734'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7539661732652343734'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-google-treats-duplicate-content.html' title='How Google treats Duplicate Content'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1745226648551979927</id><published>2009-02-14T02:55:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-14T06:10:52.068-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google Adsense'/><title type='text'>Duplicate and Triplicate Google Ad-Sense advertisements</title><summary type='text'>The recession is upon us. That seems to mean  that for many topics in many locales,  AdSense may display the same advertisement  in more than one ad slot on a page. Of course, this reduces Click-Through  Rate  (CTR- the percentage of visitors to a page who click on  advertisements) because nobody will click on the same ad twice, and people who  are not interested in finding out how to get a flat </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1745226648551979927/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1745226648551979927' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1745226648551979927'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1745226648551979927'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/02/duplicate-and-triplicate-google-ad.html' title='Duplicate and Triplicate Google Ad-Sense advertisements'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-3305743840938898258</id><published>2009-02-08T03:50:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-08T03:51:05.563-08:00</updated><title type='text'>When did it happen?</title><summary type='text'>Take a look at this news item:       Screen resolution 800 x 600 significantly    decreased for exploring the internet according to    OneStat.com       Amsterdam - July 25 - OneStat.com (    www.onestat.com ), the number one provider of    real-time intelligence web analytics, today reported that more and more    internet users choose for screen resolution 1024 x 768 which is the most    popular</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/3305743840938898258/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=3305743840938898258' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3305743840938898258'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3305743840938898258'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2009/02/when-did-it-happen.html' title='When did it happen?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1987179901047790519</id><published>2008-12-19T04:07:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-19T04:07:35.972-08:00</updated><title type='text'>IMPORTANT NOTICE - Read Me First - Before you pay for SEO (Search Engine Optimization) Services!!</title><summary type='text'>If you are about to hire a Search Engine  Optimization contractor, spend a few moments reading this - it could save you  thousands of dollars.    Not long ago I wrote a little article about How to choose a contractor  for Search Engine Optimization work. Little did I realize the vital  importance of this information for the world.    I have since seen quite a few desperate forum pleas  by people </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1987179901047790519/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1987179901047790519' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1987179901047790519'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1987179901047790519'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/important-notice-read-me-first-before.html' title='IMPORTANT NOTICE - Read Me First - Before you pay for SEO (Search Engine Optimization) Services!!'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-5394971533754597387</id><published>2008-12-18T03:09:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-18T03:10:08.002-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Registering Web pages in search engines - a better way</title><summary type='text'>Here's my year end nondenominational  Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanza and Eid el Fitr wish list  from  Google. It's simple:   1- Don't penalize me for Google bugs. I really cannot control whether  someone links to http://seo.yu-hu.com/ or http://www.seo.yu-hu.com/ or http://seo.yu-hu.com/index.html or http://www.seo.yu-hu.com/index.html. If your  spider and software are too dumb to understand they </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/5394971533754597387/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=5394971533754597387' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5394971533754597387'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5394971533754597387'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/registering-web-pages-in-search-engines.html' title='Registering Web pages in search engines - a better way'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-6527745106929959816</id><published>2008-12-08T11:57:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-08T11:57:46.862-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Less Website traffic on Weekends and in Summer</title><summary type='text'>A number of people have complained in forums about  the drop in Web site traffic in summer and weekends. It is certainly a fact.  There are not a lot of data about this, but there is at least one published set  of yearly statistics showing there is a trough every August. I could not find  any data about weekends, so I posted some of my own. My own Web sites are more  affected than most by summer </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/6527745106929959816/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=6527745106929959816' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6527745106929959816'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6527745106929959816'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/less-website-traffic-on-weekends-and-in.html' title='Less Website traffic on Weekends and in Summer'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-3997864052681206985</id><published>2008-12-07T06:47:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-07T06:47:28.474-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Add sense: Google Adsense in a recession</title><summary type='text'>If you have Google  AdSense ads in  your Website then  depending on the category of your site, you may have noticed that CTR (click  through rate) dropped for a while - quite a bit, and then seems to have  recovered. Less people may be clicking ads in a recession - they aren't buying.  And Google may have less ads in stock for that category in each location,  so they were putting up multiple </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/3997864052681206985/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=3997864052681206985' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3997864052681206985'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3997864052681206985'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/add-sense-google-adsense-in-recession.html' title='Add sense: Google Adsense in a recession'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-6392782495934158841</id><published>2008-12-07T06:24:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-07T06:24:56.207-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Troubleshooting Search Engine Optimization - back to basics</title><summary type='text'>While many people get carried away by Web 2.0  and twitter and arcane marketing strategies, they often neglect the  basics. Then they don't understand why their Web site/page is not listed.  Optimization "experts" ask in forums why their customer's page isn't doing  well. Usually it is because they neglected simple stuff or simply ignored all  the SEO  Basics.   If your Web page/site is not doing</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/6392782495934158841/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=6392782495934158841' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6392782495934158841'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6392782495934158841'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/troubleshooting-search-engine.html' title='Troubleshooting Search Engine Optimization - back to basics'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-5127318155691986516</id><published>2008-12-03T19:11:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-03T19:11:30.169-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Showstopper Google bug?</title><summary type='text'>All search engines are based on the concept of  Authority of Web pages  and Websites. The pages and sites that are deemed to have the highest authority  are retried in SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages) at the very top. Google based  its success on having the best measure of Website authority - the Google PageRank algorithm. The rationale for this intellectual and technical  feat and the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/5127318155691986516/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=5127318155691986516' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5127318155691986516'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5127318155691986516'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/showstopper-google-bug.html' title='Showstopper Google bug?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-4709009104439816875</id><published>2008-12-03T07:00:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-03T07:00:24.771-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Phishing - Black Black Hat</title><summary type='text'>Something a bit different this time. Phishing scams  and the like are probably the ultimate in  Black Hat  SEO and they are a real and costly danger to e-banking and any Web  sites that allow financial transactions. (see Danger! Your identity is not  secure). Phishing uses a variety of techniques to direct victims from a  legitimate Web site to the scam Web site, where they enter their </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/4709009104439816875/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=4709009104439816875' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4709009104439816875'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4709009104439816875'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/phishing-black-black-hat.html' title='Phishing - Black Black Hat'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-38180315288605399</id><published>2008-12-01T02:19:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-01T02:20:01.019-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The nemesis of  search engines</title><summary type='text'>The logic of dialectics dictates that  everything carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction. The basis of  Web search engines is  Website Authority and Web  page authority, determined by age and incoming links. That is also the basis  for  The killer  search engine bug. That's the short version. If you haven't figured it out:  Older is not necessary better. An older description (say </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/38180315288605399/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=38180315288605399' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/38180315288605399'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/38180315288605399'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/12/nemesis-of-search-engines.html' title='The nemesis of  search engines'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-3086227527017797417</id><published>2008-11-30T17:04:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-30T17:04:46.438-08:00</updated><title type='text'>How to choose and not choose a Search Engine Optimization Consultant</title><summary type='text'>I saw a Website that raised the issue of how to choose a  Search Engine Optimization firm. It looked very promising, but in fact,  I didn't find it particularly helpful. So I wrote an article of my own. The  meat of that article is 11 things you must know before choosing an SEO firm. Why  11? Because it wouldn't fit in 10.  The most important things: 1- Understand when a Search Engine </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/3086227527017797417/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=3086227527017797417' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3086227527017797417'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3086227527017797417'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/11/how-to-choose-and-not-choose-search.html' title='How to choose and not choose a Search Engine Optimization Consultant'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-2299999736247322339</id><published>2008-11-30T12:48:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-30T12:48:19.603-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Conversion and Landing Pages</title><summary type='text'>In writing about Landing  Pages, I studied several articles that Google found  for this search phrase. Remarkably, almost all of them were really about  Conversion Rate! A Landing page, for  those who do not know, is the page that is meant to be an an entry way into the  Web site. It is the "bait" in commercial Web sites. Conversion rate is the  measure of how many suckers visitors go from this </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/2299999736247322339/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=2299999736247322339' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2299999736247322339'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2299999736247322339'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/11/conversion-and-landing-pages.html' title='Conversion and Landing Pages'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-4204418835383040326</id><published>2008-11-24T18:24:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-24T18:24:00.600-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Conversion and bounce metrics - Sense, Nonesense and SEO</title><summary type='text'>Conversion  Rate and Bounce  Rate are SEO buzzwords that are getting bounced  around a lot lately. If you have a low conversion rate or a high bounce rate,  you should worry. It's like having too much bad cholesterol or not enough good  cholesterol. Conversion rate is directly applicable to commercial online store  Web sites and somewhat less applicable to other websites. It measures what  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/4204418835383040326/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=4204418835383040326' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4204418835383040326'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4204418835383040326'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/11/conversion-and-bounce-metrics-sense.html' title='Conversion and bounce metrics - Sense, Nonesense and SEO'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-8646492566466995867</id><published>2008-11-23T07:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-23T07:11:02.862-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Reports of Search Rank Death Greatly Exaggerated</title><summary type='text'>No, Matt Cutts didn't say rank was dead. He didn't  even come close, but if you want to believe that very much, you might decide  that is what he said. Nobody ever explains where by "rank" they mean  Google page rank or rank (position) in a list of search results. Cutts seems to  have discussed the latter. But trust me, you will need both to get traffic.  Without being ranked high, you get no </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/8646492566466995867/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=8646492566466995867' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/8646492566466995867'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/8646492566466995867'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/11/reports-of-search-rank-death-greatly.html' title='Reports of Search Rank Death Greatly Exaggerated'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-2447237959099025563</id><published>2008-11-23T07:05:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-23T07:05:52.403-08:00</updated><title type='text'>What's the difference Between SearchWiki and Search Wika and what's it all about?</title><summary type='text'> What's the difference Between SearchWiki and  Search Wikia   and what's it all about? Read about Personalized Search. Is Personalized search going  to mean the End of SEO and LIFE AS WE KNOW IT? (LAWKI). Is GOD or  Matt Cutts planning the End of Days. "For these are latter days we  know."  I don't think so. Life will go on and so will SEO. Read why  here:   Personalized Search: End of SEO?  Rank</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/2447237959099025563/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=2447237959099025563' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2447237959099025563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2447237959099025563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/11/whats-difference-between-searchwiki-and.html' title='What&apos;s the difference Between SearchWiki and Search Wika and what&apos;s it all about?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-6942239827540620554</id><published>2008-11-10T09:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-11-10T09:22:44.340-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Is there anything better than Google ??</title><summary type='text'>Google is great but not perfect. I  am not going to list the problems here, but here is one try at a solution -  there are others out there. I don't like this particular solution, because it  somehow uses the preferences of my social network as a way of ordering my search  results. If I just use the information everyone else has, I am creating an  incorrect virtual reality for myself. Besides, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/6942239827540620554/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=6942239827540620554' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6942239827540620554'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6942239827540620554'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/11/is-there-anything-better-than-google.html' title='Is there anything better than Google ??'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-7443765509456752324</id><published>2008-10-05T04:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-05T05:46:54.994-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Cloaking or Cookie Stuffing or what? Is Google really pure as the driven snow?</title><summary type='text'>It seems everyone knows everything better than I do. What do I  know?    Someone commented that the blog about Cookie Stuffing is really about cloaking and that  dear Google is innocent of any wrong doing as  they are not responsible for content of advertisements. By that logic, Website  owners should not be penalized for external broken links, since we can't check  each link, and we shouldn't be</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/7443765509456752324/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=7443765509456752324' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7443765509456752324'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7443765509456752324'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/10/cloaking-or-cookie-stuffing-or-what-is.html' title='Cloaking or Cookie Stuffing or what? Is Google really pure as the driven snow?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-4409869579438845349</id><published>2008-10-05T01:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-05T02:30:50.129-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Google advertises Black Hat SEO software</title><summary type='text'>Google prides itself on ethical business  practices and Google Webmaster guidelines repeatedly warn against unfair   Black Hat SEO practices. But Google  allows  AdSense advertisements for   Cookie  Stuffing. Here's the ad, collected today Sunday, October  5, 2008, for a search for keyword [cookie stuffing]   Cookie stuffing is an unethical way to earn lots of money  from  Affiliate advertisers.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/4409869579438845349/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=4409869579438845349' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4409869579438845349'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4409869579438845349'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-advertises-black-hat-seo.html' title='Google advertises Black Hat SEO software'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-6135114066556524425</id><published>2008-10-04T11:28:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-04T11:28:04.080-07:00</updated><title type='text'>SEO in one easy lesson</title><summary type='text'>All of Search  Engine Optimization is divided into three parts (not two, as most  "experts" would have you believe. The first two are:    On Page  Optimization - Things you do to a Web page to make it more readable for  Search  Engines.   Off Page  Optimization - Everyone tells you this means adding backlinks from other  Web sites. They mean Off Site  Optimization.    So now you've got your </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/6135114066556524425/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=6135114066556524425' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6135114066556524425'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6135114066556524425'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/10/seo-in-one-easy-lesson.html' title='SEO in one easy lesson'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-4252583015414423724</id><published>2008-10-04T09:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-04T10:11:35.824-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Search Quality Wikipedia'/><title type='text'>Wikipedia introduces the "no-follow" tag</title><summary type='text'>Wikipedia has introduced a rel = "nofollow" tag that is evidently used on all outbound  links. This was evidently done to reduce link spam that is part of  Black Hat  SEO. However it is applied indiscriminately to all links, including those on  which the articles are based, which makes it somewhat unethical. What it will  mean is that the gigantic volunteer encyclopedia which Google lists as #1 </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/4252583015414423724/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=4252583015414423724' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4252583015414423724'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4252583015414423724'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/10/wikipedia-introduces-no-follow-tag.html' title='Wikipedia introduces the &quot;no-follow&quot; tag'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-2059633853160672524</id><published>2008-09-28T16:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-01T11:30:20.385-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Search Quality'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google'/><title type='text'>Search quality: How good is Google?</title><summary type='text'> Yesterday I wrote about Google Quality Rater Secrets - how Google  uses humans to rate its search engine results. Improving the quality of search  engine results was the aim of the original search engine and ranking  algorithm described by the Google founders in The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search  Engine and The  PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web.   Google </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/2059633853160672524/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=2059633853160672524' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2059633853160672524'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2059633853160672524'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/09/search-quality-how-good-is-google.html' title='Search quality: How good is Google?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-2212947803323977492</id><published>2008-09-27T08:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-10-01T11:31:35.271-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Search Quality'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google'/><title type='text'>Google quality rating and what it means</title><summary type='text'>Google's philosophy was oriented to obtaining high quality  search engine results from the beginning. This is evident from the original  papers published by Page and Brin,  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search  Engine and The PageRank Citation  Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web,  High quality is  defined by them, basically, as the results that the user would want to get. The  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/2212947803323977492/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=2212947803323977492' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2212947803323977492'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/2212947803323977492'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/09/google-quality-rating-and-what-it-means.html' title='Google quality rating and what it means'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-3907930621755279919</id><published>2008-09-26T08:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-26T08:46:58.530-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Visitor statistics - What do the numbers mean?</title><summary type='text'>How many actual people come to your Web site and how can you  know?    How many people actually visit that Web site where you want to  advertise? Is it better or worse than the competition?    See Web  Site Statistics Versus Truth and   Web site  statistics and don't believe every number someone tells you until you  have checked!   </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/3907930621755279919/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=3907930621755279919' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3907930621755279919'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3907930621755279919'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/09/visitor-statistics-what-do-numbers-mean.html' title='Visitor statistics - What do the numbers mean?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-7612477489681970492</id><published>2008-09-23T05:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-23T05:02:27.722-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Care and feeding of Web sites</title><summary type='text'>Web sites have to keep running in order to stay in the same  place - because the web is growing, and because information, like Paris Hilton,  is aging.    Once you get to the top, you need to keep tending your Web  site if you do not want to lose visitors and Web site visibility.    Read all about Web site  Maintenance   Ami Isseroff    </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/7612477489681970492/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=7612477489681970492' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7612477489681970492'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7612477489681970492'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/09/care-and-feeding-of-web-sites.html' title='Care and feeding of Web sites'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-7513600289452659241</id><published>2008-09-23T02:35:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-09-23T02:35:11.317-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Don't let disaster strike your Web site</title><summary type='text'>If you have an online business Web site, don't  bother reading this. But if you have spent a lot of time building a news  Web site, an online dictionary, a site with a lot of  historical material or other informational Web site, please read on.     Not long ago a friend died at a relaively young age. He had  spent 12 years pioneering use of the Internet, and built a Web site of  about 20,000 </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/7513600289452659241/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=7513600289452659241' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7513600289452659241'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/7513600289452659241'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/09/dont-let-disaster-strike-your-web-site.html' title='Don&apos;t let disaster strike your Web site'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-3707771601625287467</id><published>2008-08-25T04:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-25T04:33:42.722-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What makes a page or site rank well?</title><summary type='text'>There is a very important article out in  SEOMOZ  surveying what "expert" SEO practitioners opinion on what makes a page  or site rank well. It is  mostly important to you if you have been listening to Voodoo practitioners, and  there are a lot of them out there.    I will eventually get around to discussing each factor, but in  general: * The highest ranked factors are certainly valid for  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/3707771601625287467/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=3707771601625287467' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3707771601625287467'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/3707771601625287467'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/what-makes-page-or-site-rank-well.html' title='What makes a page or site rank well?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-6208880649502861446</id><published>2008-08-19T15:54:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-19T17:47:08.476-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Can a Web page's position be sabotaged by irrelevant links?</title><summary type='text'>The brief answer to the above question is evidently "No." The  background, explanation and evidence are below.    The Google Search Engine Results Page (SERP) position of a Web  page is determined in part by the number of links to it with a relevant   keyword.  Thus, a page about Widgets that has 1,000 pages linking to it with keyword  widgets will have a higher rank than a page with similar  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/6208880649502861446/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=6208880649502861446' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6208880649502861446'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6208880649502861446'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/can-web-pages-position-be-sabotaged-by.html' title='Can a Web page&apos;s position be sabotaged by irrelevant links?'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-5444912823920521982</id><published>2008-08-16T12:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-17T18:32:40.151-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Blogging'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Web Logs'/><title type='text'>A great optimist: "Blogging Success Takes A Few Months"</title><summary type='text'> A Webpronews article tells us: Blogging Success Takes A Few MonthsOh, really? Is that all it  takes? True, the article has some fine print. But the headline is whopper.     If you think you are going to put out a Web log that gets thousands, OK,  hundreds of readers a week for every article after a month or or two or even  three, you are probably in for a big shock unless your name is something </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/5444912823920521982/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=5444912823920521982' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5444912823920521982'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/5444912823920521982'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/great-optimist-blogging-success-takes.html' title='A great optimist: &quot;Blogging Success Takes A Few Months&quot;'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-6307082807391546237</id><published>2008-08-15T12:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-15T12:59:33.083-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Worst SEO advice I've seen thus far</title><summary type='text'>I came across what might be the worst Search Engine  optimization tip I have seen thus far. Some of these Search Engine  Optimization (SEO) Superstitions are not just a  waste of time. It seems they can actually hurt site visibility in search  engines.  This one is the "advice" that Deleting old Web pages helps SEO. The  recommendation is to delete "outdated" pages when doing site maintenance. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/6307082807391546237/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=6307082807391546237' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6307082807391546237'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/6307082807391546237'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/worst-seo-advice-ive-seen-thus-far.html' title='Worst SEO advice I&apos;ve seen thus far'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1654886876105123893</id><published>2008-08-12T11:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T12:44:40.639-07:00</updated><title type='text'>SEO expert admits  inventing optimum page size superstition</title><summary type='text'>Buried somewhere in all those newsletters you get from various  SEO firms, you will find, believe it or not, an admission by a prominent SEO  opitmization "expert" that they had simply invented a supposed optimum size of  250 words for Web page text.    Different "experts" and SEO tools have often advocated various  small page sizes. This seemed strange to me, because in comparisons, I found  </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1654886876105123893/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1654886876105123893' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1654886876105123893'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1654886876105123893'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/seo-expert-admits-inventing-optimum.html' title='SEO expert admits  inventing optimum page size superstition'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1808524318106367050</id><published>2008-08-12T11:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T12:25:19.052-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Another SEO superstition - title length</title><summary type='text'>A recent article quotes an "expert" as saying that text  of title tags must be at least ten words long in order to place well in  search engines!    This is certainly false. Title tag text should be precisely as  long as is needed to contain the page keyword, and keyword should almost  never be ten words long.    For details - See Optimum  length of title text</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1808524318106367050/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1808524318106367050' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1808524318106367050'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1808524318106367050'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/another-seo-superstition-title-length.html' title='Another SEO superstition - title length'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-8313057014314465747</id><published>2008-08-12T06:13:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T07:12:32.150-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Big Brother Google is watching you - and not just them</title><summary type='text'>       And Google, the leading online advertiser, stated that it    has begun using Internet tracking technology that enables it to more precisely    follow Web-surfing behavior across affiliated  sites.   We know that Google is already gathering all sorts of  information through their online software, and likewise Yahoo! and MSN. Now the  plot thickens a bit. The technical question is, is how is</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/8313057014314465747/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=8313057014314465747' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/8313057014314465747'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/8313057014314465747'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/big-brother-google-is-watching-you-and.html' title='Big Brother Google is watching you - and not just them'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-647210297989416724</id><published>2008-08-09T10:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-10T02:18:19.631-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SEO Superstitions'/><title type='text'>A New Jersey Yankee in the court of Search Engine Optimization</title><summary type='text'>Can we remove some of the mystery from search engine optimization? The high priests guard the secrets zealously, but experimentation, a thing unknown while magic rules the land of SEO, might just reveal some of them.For example. What is Mysterology? Click the link to find out. Why am I creating links with the non-word Mysterology? Some of my pages are #3 for this word right now in Google.  This </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/647210297989416724/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=647210297989416724' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/647210297989416724'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/647210297989416724'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-jersey-yankee-in-court-of-search.html' title='A New Jersey Yankee in the court of Search Engine Optimization'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1329027076273845627</id><published>2008-08-09T08:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-10T02:19:00.144-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SEO Superstitions'/><title type='text'>The religious rites and superstitions of Search Engine Optimization</title><summary type='text'>Long ago a primitive agricutlural people tried to eke out a living in the shadow of a volcano. Nobody knew what made the rains come and the crops grow, and nobody understood why the volcano would erupt periodically and destroy everything they had built. The people had no choice but to rebuild what the lava had destroyed, for they lived on a small island, and had no other home. Furious efforts </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1329027076273845627/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1329027076273845627' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1329027076273845627'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1329027076273845627'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/religious-rites-and-superstitions-of.html' title='The religious rites and superstitions of Search Engine Optimization'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-4402190815913534928</id><published>2008-08-06T17:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-10T02:20:28.035-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Essentials of SEO'/><title type='text'>The SEO Book - Essentials section</title><summary type='text'>The SEO book is getting corrected and updated as I convert it into Web pages. It is surprising and distressing how many pages and services can disappear in a few months. Here's what is posted thus far:The SEO BookBlack Hat SEOChoosing a Domain Name Choosing a Web Host Choosing Keywords Duplicate Content and Search Engine PositioningDynamic Content Essentials Getting listed in Search Engines </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/4402190815913534928/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=4402190815913534928' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4402190815913534928'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/4402190815913534928'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/seo-book-essentials-section.html' title='The SEO Book - Essentials section'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-1234353335176840655</id><published>2008-08-06T17:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-06T18:23:02.110-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Getting started with Search Engine Optimization</title><summary type='text'>For those who want to just wet their feet in Search Engine  Optimization and find out what it is about:  SEO Basics -  An overview   SEO  for Everyone - including Dummies - the major Search engine  optimization things you can do even if you do not know anything about coding in  html.    Ami Isseroff       </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/1234353335176840655/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=1234353335176840655' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1234353335176840655'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/1234353335176840655'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/getting-started-with-search-engine.html' title='Getting started with Search Engine Optimization'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1435735249954721515.post-264533265055587017</id><published>2008-08-03T13:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-03T13:56:15.666-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What's it about</title><summary type='text'>SEO (Search Engine Optimization) for everyone is about optimizing search engines for Web sites and about the SEO Web site which has a brief online handbook to help you make your site number 1 on the Web.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/feeds/264533265055587017/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1435735249954721515&amp;postID=264533265055587017' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/264533265055587017'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1435735249954721515/posts/default/264533265055587017'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://seo-for-all.blogspot.com/2008/08/whats-it-about.html' title='What&apos;s it about'/><author><name>News Service</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02033603414923093624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
